Timepieces, like cars, homes, and clothing, dwell squarely at the intersection of form and function. The fact that the market is limited for cars without engines, homes without roofs, and pants without crotches*, would seem to indicate that we do not hold timepieces to the same "function" standard as their counterparts. Because clocks and watches without numbers are f*@#ing everywhere.With very few notable exceptions the primary function of any timepiece is to tell time. To their credit, clocks without numbers do indeed keep track of the time. However, they do a appalling job of communicating that time, rendering them about as useful as an English-to- Gobbledygook phrasebook. The question, "what time is it?" should never be a stumper.
Proponents of watches and clocks without numbers ask that we excuse them on grounds of aesthetics or luxury. There are limits to such exemptions in other areas, so why not in time-telling?
Officer: Do you know how fast you were going back there?
Driver: No officer, this is a very nice car.
Office: Excuse me?
Driver: Oh, forgive me, commoner! You did not actually think my speedometer was equipped with numbers! (to passenger) I find that quite diverting!
Passenger: I say! How very diverting indeed!
*I said limited, not non-existent.
Next items up for banishment: Erasable Pens or Dolls that Wet Themselves


